Chapter orientation
From corporate default to forum, trial and resolution
Chapter XXVIII creates the criminal-court architecture for Companies Act offences and then adds controlled alternatives and safeguards: compounding for eligible offences, mediation for suitable pending company-law disputes, sentencing factors and reduced civil penalties for specified smaller company classes.
Do not mix routes
A civil penalty adjudicated by an adjudicating officer is different from a criminal fine imposed after prosecution. Compounding is different again.
Forum follows punishment
Sections 435-440 allocate offences to Sessions-level or Magistrate-level Special Courts and preserve High Court appellate/revisional control.
Relief is conditional
Sections 441 and 446B apply only when their statutory eligibility conditions are met; neither provision erases the underlying compliance obligation.
2026 legislative control: The Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 proposes to raise the Section 441 Regional Director threshold from Rs 25 lakh to Rs 1 crore and permit a prescribed Section 446B percentage below one-half. These proposals are not treated as operative law.
Operative snapshot
The chapter in numbers
14
Numbered provisions from Sections 435 to 446B.
2 years
Punishment threshold separating Sessions-level and Magistrate-level Special Courts.
Rs 25 lakh
Current maximum-fine threshold for Regional Director/authorised officer compounding jurisdiction.
3 months
Target period for the Mediation and Conciliation Panel to dispose of a reference.
Visual framework
Special Court lifecycle
Criminal-procedure transition from 1 July 2024: Chapter XXVIII still textually refers to CrPC, 1973. BNSS, 2023 repealed it from 1 July 2024, while section 531 preserves pending appeals, applications, trials, inquiries and investigations and carries forward specified acts/orders. Identify the commencement date and apply BNSS or saved CrPC procedure with the Companies Act special-court provisions.
Decision table
Penalty, prosecution, compounding and mediation are not substitutes
| Route | Nature | Decision-maker | Core outcome |
|---|
| Adjudication of penalty | Civil monetary consequence where the Act says “penalty” | Adjudicating Officer; appeal to Regional Director | Penalty order; separate compliance cure may remain |
| Criminal prosecution | Offence carrying fine and/or imprisonment | Special Court or transitional competent court | Acquittal or conviction |
| Compounding | Statutory settlement of eligible criminal offence | Regional Director/authorised officer or NCLT | Payment and discharge/no prosecution for compounded offence |
| Mediation | Consensual dispute-resolution assistance during pending proceeding | Mediation and Conciliation Panel | Recommendations; objections may be filed |
Bare Act + decoded
Section 435 - Establishment of Special Courts.— (1) The Central Government may, for the purpose of
435
Special Court design and offence split[435. Establishment of Special Courts.— (1) The Central Government may, for the purpose of
providing speedy trial of 2[offences under this Act, except under section 452, by notification] establish or
designate as many Special Courts as may be necessary.
(2) A Special Court shall consist of—
(a) a single judge holding office as Session Judge or Additional Session Judge, in case of offences
punishable under this Act with imprisonment of two years or more; and
(b) a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, in the case of other offences,
who shall be appointed by the Central Government with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High
Court within whose jurisdiction the judge to be appointed is working.]
Decoded: Designated courts provide speedy trial. Offences punishable with imprisonment of two years or more go to a Sessions-level Special Court; other covered offences go to a Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate First Class. Section 452 is excluded from the Section 435 notification route.
Risk control: Classify whether the consequence is a penalty, fine, imprisonment, continuing default or repeat offence before selecting the forum or relief route.
Practical example: A company cannot assume that payment of additional filing fees compounds an offence. It must cure the filing default and, where prosecution exposure exists, separately assess Section 441 eligibility and jurisdiction.
Bare Act + decoded
Section 436 - Offences triable by Special Courts.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of
436
Exclusive trial, cognizance and summary procedure436. Offences triable by Special Courts.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974),—
(a) 3[all offences specified under sub-section (1) of section 435] shall be triable only by the Special
Court established or designated for the area in which the registered office of the company in relation to
which the offence is committed or where there are more Special Courts than one for such area, by such
one of them as may be specified in this behalf by the High Court concerned;
(b) where a person accused of, or suspected of the commission of, an offence under this Act is
forwarded to a Magistrate under sub-section (2) or sub-section (2A) of section 167 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), such Magistrate may authorise the detention of such person in
such custody as he thinks fit for a period not exceeding fifteen days in the whole where such Magistrate
is a Judicial Magistrate and seven days in the whole where such Magistrate is an Executive Magistrate:
Provided that where such Magistrate considers that the detention of such person upon or before the
expiry of the period of detention is unnecessary, he shall order such person to be forwarded to the
Special Court having jurisdiction;
(c) the Special Court may exercise, in relation to the person forwarded to it under clause (b), the
same power which a Magistrate having jurisdiction to try a case may exercise under section 167 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) in relation to an accused person who has been forwarded
to him under that section; and
(d) a Special Court may, upon perusal of the police report of the facts constituting an offence under
this Act or upon a complaint in that behalf, take cognizance of that offence without the accused being
committed to it for trial.
(2) When trying an offence under this Act, a Special Court may also try an offence other than an offence
under this Act with which the accused may, under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) be
charged at the same trial.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the
Special Court may, if it thinks fit, try in a summary way any offence under this Act which is punishable
with imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years:
Provided that in the case of any conviction in a summary trial, no sentence of imprisonment for a term
exceeding one year shall be passed:
Provided further that when at the commencement of, or in the course of, a summary trial, it appears to
the Special Court that the nature of the case is such that the sentence of imprisonment for a term exceeding
one year may have to be passed or that it is, for any other reason, undesirable to try the case summarily, the
Special Court shall, after hearing the parties, record an order to that effect and thereafter recall any witnesses
who may have been examined and proceed to hear or rehear the case in accordance with the procedure for
the regular trial.
Decoded: The Special Court can take cognizance directly on a police report or complaint, exercise remand powers, try connected offences and use summary trial for offences punishable up to three years, subject to the one-year imprisonment ceiling in a summary conviction.
Risk control: Classify whether the consequence is a penalty, fine, imprisonment, continuing default or repeat offence before selecting the forum or relief route.
Practical example: A company cannot assume that payment of additional filing fees compounds an offence. It must cure the filing default and, where prosecution exposure exists, separately assess Section 441 eligibility and jurisdiction.
Bare Act + decoded
Section 437 - Appeal and revision.—The High Court may exercise, so far as may be applicable, all the powers
437
High Court appellate and revisional control437. Appeal and revision.—The High Court may exercise, so far as may be applicable, all the powers
conferred by Chapters XXIX and XXX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) on a High
Court, as if a Special Court within the local limits of the jurisdiction of the High Court were a Court of
Session trying cases within the local limits of the jurisdiction of the High Court.
Decoded: The High Court exercises appeal and revision powers as though the Special Court were a Court of Session within its jurisdiction.
Risk control: Classify whether the consequence is a penalty, fine, imprisonment, continuing default or repeat offence before selecting the forum or relief route.
Practical example: A company cannot assume that payment of additional filing fees compounds an offence. It must cure the filing default and, where prosecution exposure exists, separately assess Section 441 eligibility and jurisdiction.
Bare Act + decoded
Section 438 - Application of Code to proceedings before Special Court.—Save as otherwise provided in this
438
Criminal procedure applies unless displaced438. Application of Code to proceedings before Special Court.—Save as otherwise provided in this
Act, the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) shall apply to the proceedings
before a Special Court and for the purposes of the said provisions, the Special Court shall be 1[deemed to
be a Court of Session or the court of Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, as
the case may be,] and the person conducting a prosecution before a Special Court shall be deemed to be a
Public Prosecutor.
Decoded: The ordinary criminal-procedure framework applies except where the Companies Act provides otherwise. The Special Court is treated as the relevant Sessions or Magistrate court and the prosecutor as a Public Prosecutor.
Risk control: Classify whether the consequence is a penalty, fine, imprisonment, continuing default or repeat offence before selecting the forum or relief route.
Practical example: A company cannot assume that payment of additional filing fees compounds an offence. It must cure the filing default and, where prosecution exposure exists, separately assess Section 441 eligibility and jurisdiction.
Bare Act + decoded
Section 439 - Offences to be non-cognizable.—(1) Notwithstanding anything in the Code of Criminal
439
Non-cognizable default rule and complaint gate439. Offences to be non-cognizable.—(1) Notwithstanding anything in the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), every offence under this Act except the offences referred to in sub-section (6)
of section 212 shall be deemed to be non-cognizable within the meaning of the said Code.
(2) No court shall take cognizance of any offence under this Act which is alleged to have been
committed by any company or any officer thereof, except on the complaint in writing of the Registrar, a
shareholder 2[or a member] of the company, or of a person authorised by the Central Government in that
behalf:
Provided that the court may take cognizance of offences relating to issue and transfer of securities and
non-payment of dividend, on a complaint in writing, by a person authorised by the Securities and Exchange
Board of India:
Provided further that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to a prosecution by a company of any of
its officers.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974),where
the complainant under sub-section (2) is the Registrar or a person authorised by the Central Government,
the presence of such officer before the Court trying the offences shall not be necessary unless the court
requires his personal attendance at the trial.
(4) The provisions of sub-section (2) shall not apply to any action taken by the liquidator of a company
in respect of any offence alleged to have been committed in respect of any of the matters in Chapter XX or
in any other provision of this Act relating to winding up of companies.
Explanation.—The liquidator of a company shall not be deemed to be an officer of the company within
the meaning of sub-section (2).
Decoded: Companies Act offences are generally non-cognizable except the serious fraud offences covered by Section 212(6). Cognizance ordinarily requires a written complaint from an authorised statutory complainant, shareholder/member or SEBI-authorised person for specified securities matters.
Risk control: Classify whether the consequence is a penalty, fine, imprisonment, continuing default or repeat offence before selecting the forum or relief route.
Practical example: A company cannot assume that payment of additional filing fees compounds an offence. It must cure the filing default and, where prosecution exposure exists, separately assess Section 441 eligibility and jurisdiction.
Bare Act + decoded
Section 440 - Transitional provisions.—Any offence committed under this Act, which is triable by a Special
440
Fallback forum until Special Court exists440. Transitional provisions.—Any offence committed under this Act, which is triable by a Special
Court shall, until a Special Court is established, be tried by a 3[Court of Session or the Court of Metropolitan
Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, as the case may be] exercising jurisdiction over the
area, notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974):
Provided that nothing contained in this section shall affect the powers of the High Court under section
407 of the Code to transfer any case or class of cases taken cognizance by a 1[Court of Session or the Court
of Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, as the case may be] under this section.
Decoded: Until a Special Court is established, the competent Sessions or Magistrate court exercises jurisdiction, subject to High Court transfer powers.
Risk control: Classify whether the consequence is a penalty, fine, imprisonment, continuing default or repeat offence before selecting the forum or relief route.
Practical example: A company cannot assume that payment of additional filing fees compounds an offence. It must cure the filing default and, where prosecution exposure exists, separately assess Section 441 eligibility and jurisdiction.
Bare Act + decoded
Section 441 - Compounding of certain offences.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of
441
Compounding as a controlled settlement of eligible offences441. Compounding of certain offences.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), any offence punishable under this Act (whether committed by a
company or any officer thereof) 4[not being an offence punishable with imprisonment only, or punishable
with imprisonment and also with fine], may, either before or after the institution of any prosecution, be
compounded by—
(a) the Tribunal; or
(b) where the maximum amount of fine which may be imposed for such offence 5[does not exceed
twenty-five lakh rupees], by the Regional Director or any officer authorised by the Central Government,
on payment or credit, by the company or, as the case may be, the officer, to the Central Government of
such sum as that Tribunal or the Regional Director or any officer authorised by the Central Government,
as the case may be, may specify:
Provided that the sum so specified shall not, in any case, exceed the maximum amount of the fine which
may be imposed for the offence so compounded:
Provided further that in specifying the sum required to be paid or credited for the compounding of an
offence under this sub-section, the sum, if any, paid by way of additional fee under sub-section (2) of section
403 shall be taken into account:
Provided also that any offence covered under this sub-section by any company or its officer shall not
be compounded if the investigation against such company has been initiated or is pending under this Act.
(2) Nothing in sub-section (1) shall apply to an offence committed by a company or its officer within a
period of three years from the date on which a similar offence committed by it or him was compounded
under this section.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this section,—
(a) any second or subsequent offence committed after the expiry of a period of three years from the
date on which the offence was previously compounded, shall be deemed to be a first offence;
(b) “Regional Director” means a person appointed by the Central Government as a Regional
Director for the purposes of this Act.
(3) (a) Every application for the compounding of an offence shall be made to the Registrar who shall
forward the same, together with his comments thereon, to the Tribunal or the Regional Director or any
officer authorised by the Central Government, as the case may be.
(b) Where any offence is compounded under this section, whether before or after the institution of any
prosecution, an intimation thereof shall be given by the company to the Registrar within seven days from
the date on which the offence is so compounded.
(c) Where any offence is compounded before the institution of any prosecution, no prosecution shall be
instituted in relation to such offence, either by the Registrar or by any share holder of the company or by
any person authorised by the Central Government against the offender in relation to whom the offence is
so compounded.
(d) Where the compounding of any offence is made after the institution of any prosecution, such
compounding shall be brought by the Registrar in writing, to the notice of the court in which the prosecution
is pending and on such notice of the compounding of the offence being given, the company or its officer in
relation to whom the offence is so compounded shall be discharged.
(4) The Tribunal or the Regional Director or any officer authorised by the Central Government, as the
case may be, while dealing with a proposal for the compounding of an offence for a default in compliance
with any provision of this Act which requires a company or its officer to file or register with, or deliver or
send to, the Registrar any return, account or other document, may direct, by an order, if it or he thinks fit to
do so, any officer or other employee of the company to file or register with, or on payment of the fee, and
the additional fee, required to be paid under section 403, such return, account or other document within
such time as may be specified in the order.
[(5) If any officer or other employee of the company who fails to comply with any order made by the
Tribunal or the Regional Director or any officer authorised by the Central Government under sub-section
(4), the maximum amount of fine for the offence proposed to be compounded under this section shall be
twice the amount provided in the corresponding section in which punishment for such offence is provided.]
[(6) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), any
offence which is punishable under this Act with imprisonment only or with imprisonment and also with
fine shall not be compoundable.]
(7) No offence specified in this section shall be compounded except under and in accordance with the
provisions of this section.
242
Decoded: Eligible offences may be compounded before or after prosecution. The Regional Director/authorised officer currently handles cases where the maximum fine does not exceed Rs 25 lakh; higher-fine matters go to NCLT. Imprisonment-only and imprisonment-plus-fine offences are not compoundable.
Risk control: Classify whether the consequence is a penalty, fine, imprisonment, continuing default or repeat offence before selecting the forum or relief route.
Practical example: A company cannot assume that payment of additional filing fees compounds an offence. It must cure the filing default and, where prosecution exposure exists, separately assess Section 441 eligibility and jurisdiction.
Bare Act + decoded
Section 442 - Mediation and Conciliation Panel.—(1) The Central Government shall maintain a panel of
442
Mediation during pending company-law proceedings442. Mediation and Conciliation Panel.—(1) The Central Government shall maintain a panel of
experts to be called as the Mediation and Conciliation Panel consisting of such number of experts having
such qualifications as may be prescribed for mediation between the parties during the pendency of any
proceedings before the Central Government or the Tribunal or the Appellate Tribunal under this Act.
(2) Any of the parties to the proceedings may, at any time during the proceedings before the Central
Government or the Tribunal or the Appellate Tribunal, apply to the Central Government or the Tribunal or
the Appellate Tribunal, as the case may be, in such form along with such fees as may be prescribed, for
referring the matter pertaining to such proceedings to the Mediation and Conciliation Panel and the Central
Government or the Tribunal or the Appellate Tribunal, as the case may be, shall appoint one or more experts
from the panel referred to in sub-section (1).
(3) The Central Government or the Tribunal or the Appellate Tribunal before which any proceeding is
pending may, suo motu, refer any matter pertaining to such proceeding to such number of experts from the
Mediation and Conciliation Panel as the Central Government or the Tribunal or the Appellate Tribunal, as
the case may be, deems fit.
(4) The fee and other terms and conditions of experts of the Mediation and Conciliation Panel shall be
such as may be prescribed.
(5) The Mediation and Conciliation Panel shall follow such procedure as may be prescribed and dispose
of the matter referred to it within a period of three months from the date of such reference and forward its
recommendations to the Central Government or the Tribunal or the Appellate Tribunal, as the case may be.
(6) Any party aggreived by the recommendation of the Mediation and Conciliation Panel may file
objections to the Central Government or the Tribunal or the Appellate Tribunal, as the case may be.
Decoded: The Central Government maintains a Mediation and Conciliation Panel. Parties, or the Government/Tribunal/Appellate Tribunal suo motu, may refer a pending matter; the panel should report within three months and parties may object to its recommendations.
Risk control: Classify whether the consequence is a penalty, fine, imprisonment, continuing default or repeat offence before selecting the forum or relief route.
Practical example: A company cannot assume that payment of additional filing fees compounds an offence. It must cure the filing default and, where prosecution exposure exists, separately assess Section 441 eligibility and jurisdiction.
Bare Act + decoded
Section 443 - Power of Central Government to appoint company prosecutors.—Notwithstanding anything
443
Company prosecutors443. Power of Central Government to appoint company prosecutors.—Notwithstanding anything
contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government may appoint
generally, or for any case, or in any case, or for any specified class of cases in any local area, one or more
persons, as company prosecutors for the conduct of prosecutions arising out of this Act and the persons so
appointed as company prosecutors shall have all the powers and privileges conferred by the Code on Public
Prosecutors appointed under section 24 of the Code.
Decoded: The Central Government may appoint company prosecutors for individual matters, classes of matters or local areas, with the powers of Public Prosecutors.
Risk control: Classify whether the consequence is a penalty, fine, imprisonment, continuing default or repeat offence before selecting the forum or relief route.
Practical example: A company cannot assume that payment of additional filing fees compounds an offence. It must cure the filing default and, where prosecution exposure exists, separately assess Section 441 eligibility and jurisdiction.
Bare Act + decoded
Section 444 - Appeal against acquittal.—Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal
444
Government-directed appeal against acquittal444. Appeal against acquittal.—Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the Central Government may, in any case arising under this Act, direct any
company prosecutor or authorise any other person either by name or by virtue of his office, to present an
appeal from an order of acquittal passed by any court, other than a High Court, and an appeal presented by
such prosecutor or other person shall be deemed to have been validly presented to the appellate court.
Decoded: The Central Government may direct a company prosecutor or authorised person to appeal an acquittal by a court other than a High Court.
Risk control: Classify whether the consequence is a penalty, fine, imprisonment, continuing default or repeat offence before selecting the forum or relief route.
Practical example: A company cannot assume that payment of additional filing fees compounds an offence. It must cure the filing default and, where prosecution exposure exists, separately assess Section 441 eligibility and jurisdiction.
Bare Act + decoded
Section 445 - Compensation for accusation without reasonable cause.—The provisions of section 250 of the
445
Compensation for accusation without reasonable cause445. Compensation for accusation without reasonable cause.—The provisions of section 250 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) shall apply mutatis mutandis to compensation for accusation
without reasonable cause before the Special Court or the Court of Session.
Decoded: The criminal-procedure compensation mechanism applies to baseless accusations before the Special Court or Court of Session.
Risk control: Classify whether the consequence is a penalty, fine, imprisonment, continuing default or repeat offence before selecting the forum or relief route.
Practical example: A company cannot assume that payment of additional filing fees compounds an offence. It must cure the filing default and, where prosecution exposure exists, separately assess Section 441 eligibility and jurisdiction.
Bare Act + decoded
Section 446 - Application of fines.—The court imposing any fine under this Act may direct that the whole or
446
Use of fines446. Application of fines.—The court imposing any fine under this Act may direct that the whole or
any part thereof shall be applied in or towards payment of the costs of the proceedings, or in or towards the
payment of a reward to the person on whose information the proceedings were instituted.
1
Decoded: A court may direct all or part of a fine towards proceeding costs or a reward to the informant.
Risk control: Classify whether the consequence is a penalty, fine, imprisonment, continuing default or repeat offence before selecting the forum or relief route.
Practical example: A company cannot assume that payment of additional filing fees compounds an offence. It must cure the filing default and, where prosecution exposure exists, separately assess Section 441 eligibility and jurisdiction.
Bare Act + decoded
Section 446A - Factors for determining level of punishment.—The court or the Special Court, while deciding
446A
Sentencing factors[446A. Factors for determining level of punishment.—The court or the Special Court, while deciding
the amount of fine or imprisonment under this Act, shall have due regard to the following factors, namely:—
(a) size of the company;
(b) nature of business carried on by the company;
(c) injury to public interest;
(d) nature of the default; and
(e) repetition of the default.
2
Decoded: While deciding fine or imprisonment, the court must consider company size, business nature, public-interest injury, nature of default and repetition.
Risk control: Classify whether the consequence is a penalty, fine, imprisonment, continuing default or repeat offence before selecting the forum or relief route.
Practical example: A company cannot assume that payment of additional filing fees compounds an offence. It must cure the filing default and, where prosecution exposure exists, separately assess Section 441 eligibility and jurisdiction.
Bare Act + decoded
Section 446B - Lesser penalties for certain companies.—Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, if
446B
Reduced civil penalties for specified company classes[446B. Lesser penalties for certain companies.—Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, if
penalty is payable for non-compliance of any of the provisions of this Act by a One Person Company, small
company, start-up company or Producer Company, or by any of its officer in default, or any other person
in respect of such company, then such company, its officer in default or any other person, as the case may
be, shall be liable to a penalty which shall not be more than one-half of the penalty specified in such
provisions subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a company and one lakh rupees in case of
an officer who is in default or any other person, as the case may be.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this section,—
(a) “Producer Company” means a company as defined in clause (l) of section 378A;
(b) “start-up company” means a private company incorporated under this Act or under the
Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and recognised as start-up in accordance with the notification issued
by the Central Government in the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade.]
Decoded: For an OPC, small company, start-up company or Producer Company, the civil penalty is capped at one-half of the ordinary penalty, subject to Rs 2 lakh for the company and Rs 1 lakh for an officer or other person. This is a penalty relief, not a blanket reduction of criminal fine or imprisonment.
Risk control: Classify whether the consequence is a penalty, fine, imprisonment, continuing default or repeat offence before selecting the forum or relief route.
Practical example: A company cannot assume that payment of additional filing fees compounds an offence. It must cure the filing default and, where prosecution exposure exists, separately assess Section 441 eligibility and jurisdiction.
Section 441 deep dive
Compounding decision framework
1. Identify exact offenceUse the operative section and amendment date.
→
2. Test punishmentImprisonment-only or imprisonment plus fine is not compoundable.
→
3. Check repeat barAn offence repeated within three years of a previously compounded similar offence is not eligible.
→
4. Select authorityMaximum fine up to Rs 25 lakh: RD/authorised officer; otherwise NCLT.
Before prosecution: Once validly compounded, prosecution should not be instituted for that offence against the person covered.
After prosecution: The Registrar informs the criminal court; the covered company/officer is discharged in relation to the compounded offence.
Not a compliance amnesty: The compounding authority may direct filing or delivery of the overdue return or document. Failure to obey can double the maximum fine for the offence proposed to be compounded.
Mediation rules
Mediation and Conciliation Panel - practical architecture
Entry
A party may apply during a pending proceeding, or the Central Government/NCLT/NCLAT may refer a matter suo motu.
Process
Panel experts disclose conflicts, conduct confidential sessions, identify settlement terms and aim to report within three months.
Exit
The panel forwards recommendations. An aggrieved party may file objections before the referring authority.
Suitability test: Mediation is useful for commercial, governance and implementation disputes capable of consensual settlement. It cannot validate an illegal act, extinguish non-waivable public-law duties or replace mandatory criminal process.
Visual framework
Offence and penalty control map
Section 446B application
How to calculate lesser penalty
Eligible penalty = lower of: (ordinary statutory penalty x 50%) and applicable cap
Company cap
Rs 2 lakh
Maximum under Section 446B for the eligible company.
Officer/person cap
Rs 1 lakh
Maximum for each officer in default or other covered person.
Example: Ordinary penalty is Rs 6 lakh for the company and Rs 2.5 lakh for an officer. An eligible small company pays at most Rs 2 lakh; the officer pays at most Rs 1 lakh. Eligibility must be established on the relevant date and the provision must impose a “penalty,” not a criminal fine.
Practical casebook
Eight decision cases
Late annual filing with prosecution exposure
Paying additional fee does not by itself compound an offence. Cure the filing, verify the current punishment clause and consider Section 441.
Fraud offence investigated by SFIO
Section 212(6) offences are outside the general non-cognizable rule and carry special bail conditions; do not treat them like routine defaults.
Section 452 complaint
Section 452 is excluded from the Section 435 notification route; identify the competent ordinary criminal court and current procedural law.
Repeat default after compounding
A similar offence committed within three years of a compounded offence is treated as a first offence for punishment but is not eligible for fresh compounding under the Section 441 repeat bar.
OPC faces civil penalty
Apply Section 446B only after confirming OPC status and that the relevant provision uses “penalty.”
Court considers sentence
Section 446A requires consideration of company size, business, public-interest injury, default nature and repetition.
Shareholder files complaint
Section 439 permits a shareholder/member complaint, but pleadings must identify the offence, locus and supporting evidence.
Commercial dispute during NCLT case
Mediation may be requested, but statutory approval and public-law compliance cannot be contracted away.
Professional checklist
Before initiating, defending or resolving a Companies Act offence
Legal classification
- Exact section and amendment date
- Penalty versus fine/imprisonment
- Cognizable status
- Authorised complainant
- Special Court notification and territory
Evidence
- Board and committee records
- MCA filing receipts
- Notices and proof of service
- Ledger and bank support
- Officer-responsibility matrix
Resolution
- Cure underlying default
- Assess compounding
- Assess mediation suitability
- Compute Section 446B relief
- Track appeal and reporting deadlines
2026 proposal register
Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 - not operative
| Provision | Current law | Bill proposal |
|---|
| Section 441(1)(b) | RD/authorised officer where maximum fine does not exceed Rs 25 lakh | Raise threshold to Rs 1 crore |
| Section 446B | Penalty not more than one-half, within caps | Permit one-half or a prescribed lower percentage |
The Bill was introduced on 23 March 2026 and remains before a Joint Parliamentary Committee as at 28 June 2026. The package does not apply these proposals as current law.
Finin2min Q&A
Rapid revision
Are all Companies Act offences tried by a Sessions Judge?
No. The forum depends on the punishment threshold; other offences go to a Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate First Class.
Are all offences cognizable?
No. They are generally non-cognizable, except the serious Section 212(6) category.
Can additional filing fee replace compounding?
No.
Can an imprisonment-plus-fine offence be compounded?
No.
Can compounding occur after prosecution starts?
Yes, for an eligible offence; the criminal court is informed and the covered person is discharged.
Does mediation decide the case?
The panel makes recommendations; parties may object and the referring authority retains control.
Does Section 446B reduce imprisonment?
No. It concerns civil penalties.
Does a start-up automatically qualify forever?
No. Recognition and eligibility must be checked at the relevant time.
Can the Central Government appeal an acquittal?
Yes, under Section 444 through a company prosecutor or authorised person.
Where does appeal from Special Court go?
The High Court exercises applicable appellate and revisional powers.