Vasundhara Builders And Developers — R/Special Civil Application Nos. 16029 and 16087 of 2025
Decision in brief
See the complete judgment and operative order below.
Editorial control: The proposition above is a concise discovery summary. The complete court text and operative order below control.
Complete judgment
Download the complete local PDF
Read complete searchable court-copy text
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/16029/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 09/06/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16029 of 2025
With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.16087 of 2025
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA
and
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
==============================================================
Approved for Reporting Yes No
==============================================================
VASUNDHARA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS
Versus
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
==============================================================
Appearance:
MR TUSHAR HEMANI, SENIOR ADVOCATE with MS VAIBHAVI K
PARIKH(3238) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
KARAN G SANGHANI(7945) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
==============================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA
and
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Date : 09/06/2026
COMMON ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA)
1. With consent, the matter is taken up for final hearing and final
disposal.
2. With consent, Special Civil Application No. 16029 of 2025 is
taken as lead matter.
3. The petitioner by way of the present writ petition challenges the
action of the respondent in rejecting the declaration filed by the
petitioner under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024,
(hereinafter referred to as “the Scheme”) for the Assessment Year (for
short, “AY”) 2015-16 on 16.05.2025.
Page 1 of 9
Uploaded by SHARMA KUMKUM MAHENDRA(HC02349) on Tue Jun 16 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Jun 18 16:21:14 IST 2026
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/16029/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 09/06/2026
BRIEF FACTS:
3.1. Prior to the rejection of the declaration filed by the petitioner
availing the benefit under the scheme, it appears that the petitioner
was subjected to the reassessment by the department by resorting to
the provision of Section 153(C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, (for short,
“the Act”) on the basis of the search proceedings conducted under
Section 132 of the Act by the investigating wing on the Residential and
Official premises of one Sadhani Brothers and also simultaneously a
survey action under Section 133A of the Act was also carried out. It
was alleged that the petitioner was beneficiary of the accommodation
entries managed and maintained by the Sadhani Brothers and such
allegations emanated from the incriminating material, i.e., the
documents seized from the search and survey action against Sadhani
Brothers.
3.2. It appears that thereafter, the petitioner objected to the
proceedings under Section 153C of the Act and accordingly by the
order dated 24.12.2019 passed by the respondent authority, the
proceedings initiated under Section 153C of the Act were dropped.
Subsequent thereto, it appears that for the AY in consideration, the
assessment was reopened by the department by resorting to the
provision of Section 147 of the Act. The petitioner objected to the
reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Act which was
disposed of by the respondent on 24.12.2021 rejecting such request of
the petitioner to drop the proceedings. It appears that the petitioner
filed an appeal against the order dated 24.02.2022 before the first
appellate authority on 23.03.2022.
3.3. During the pendency of appeal, the Central government notified
the Scheme vide Finance (Act No. 2), 2024 on 16.08.2024 with the
objective of reducing pending income tax litigation benefiting the tax
Page 2 of 9
Uploaded by SHARMA KUMKUM MAHENDRA(HC02349) on Tue Jun 16 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Jun 18 16:21:14 IST 2026
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/16029/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 09/06/2026
payers by providing them an opportunity to opt the benefit of such
scheme in order to avoid the long drawn and vexatious litigation
process. The Scheme provides exhaustive parameters which are to be
fulfilled by the assessee in order to get the benefit. Accordingly, in
order to avail the benefit of the scheme, the petitioner filed a
declaration under the prescribed form (Form-1) on 31.12.2024 for
settling his appeal before the First Appellate Authority, however, the
same has been rejected on 16.05.2025 by the respondent by resorting
to the provision of Section 96 of the Scheme. In view of the provision
of Section 96 of the Scheme, the petitioner is debarred from having
the benefit since he was subjected to search proceedings under
Section 132 of the Act and the incriminating material and the
documents which were seized from Sadhani Brothers during the
search under Section 132 of the Act would be detrimental to availing
the benefit of the scheme.
3.4. The petitioner, through its Chartered Accountant letter dated
22.05.2025 requested the respondent no. 1 to accept its Form-1 dated
31.12.2024 and to allow him to avail the benefit of the scheme, more
particularly, in view of the fact that the proceedings under Section
153C of the Act were dropped which emanated from search under
Section 132 of the Act. However, it appears that since no response
was given, the petitioner is constrained to approach this Court by
filing the present writ petition.
SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER
4. Learned Senior Advocate Mr. Tushar Hemani appearing for the
petitioner, at the outset has submitted that the respondents have
grossly misapplied the provision of Section 96(a)(i) of the Scheme
(Finance Act No.2, 2024), in case of the petitioner, since the
proceedings which emanated by resorting to the provision of Section
153C of the Act which has direct link with ‘search’ under the provision
Page 3 of 9
Uploaded by SHARMA KUMKUM MAHENDRA(HC02349) on Tue Jun 16 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Jun 18 16:21:14 IST 2026
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/16029/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 09/06/2026
of Section 132 of the Act has been dropped and instead, the
department has resorted to invoke the provision of Section 147 of the
Act based upon ‘survey’ material under Section 133A of the Act and
since the provision of Section 132 of the Act would not apply, the
petitioner cannot be restricted from availing the benefit of the scheme.
Thus, it is urged that the impugned action of the respondent in
rejecting the Form No. 1 dated 31.12.2024 may be quashed and set
aside.
SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF REVENUE
5. Opposing the present writ petition and the aforesaid
submissions, learned Senior Standing Counsel Mr. K. G. Sanghani,
while referring to the contents of the affidavit-in-reply has submitted
that the petitioner was subjected to the reopening of the assessment
by resorting to the provision of Section 153C of the Act on the basis of
search and survey action undertaken under Section 132 and 133A of
the Act at the residential and office premises of Sadhani Brothers on
08.06.2017, and during the course of search and survey and on the
basis of the incriminating material found during the search and
survey, it was found that the petitioner was beneficiary of the
accommodation entries. It is submitted that thus, there are serious
allegations against the petitioner and during the course of such
proceedings and on the basis of the statement recorded under Section
132(4) of the Act, the petitioner has admitted that he has earned an
income of Rs. 25 lakhs out of such accommodation entries. Thus, it is
submitted that in the present case, the survey under Section 133A of
the Act is an independent or standalone proceeding but was integrally
linked to the search operation conducted on the Sadhani Brothers
and since the material gathered during the survey was examined and
it directly points out the complexity of the present petitioner, his case
for availing the benefit of the scheme gets debarred under the
Page 4 of 9
Uploaded by SHARMA KUMKUM MAHENDRA(HC02349) on Tue Jun 16 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Jun 18 16:21:14 IST 2026
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/16029/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 09/06/2026
provision of Section 96(a)(i) of the Scheme. Thus, it is urged that the
writ petition may not be admitted.
OPINION AND CONCLUSION
6. We have heard the learned advocates appearing for the
respective parties at length. The facts which are established from the
records and pleadings are as below:
(a) A search under Section 132 of the Act and survey action under
Section 133A of the Act was conducted at the residential as well as
office premises of the Sadhani Brothers in which incriminating
material connecting the present petitioner was found. It was alleged
that the petitioner was beneficiary of the accommodation entries and
accordingly, the proceedings under Section 153C of the Act were
initiated.
(b) The petitioner objected the re-opening of the assessment under
Section 153C of the Act and accordingly, by the order dated
24.12.2019 passed by the respondent authorities, the proceedings
under Section 153C of the Act were dropped.
(c) Thereafter, the revenue by resorting to the provision of section
147 of the Act the assessment was re-opened vide assessment order
dated 24.02.2022. The petitioner filed an appeal against the said order
on 23.03.2022,which appears to be pending.
(d) During the pendency of the appeal, the petitioner filed Form-1 on
31.12.2024, for availing the benefit of the Scheme introduced vide
Finance Act, 2024 on 16.08.2024.
(e) The Form-1 of the petitioner is rejected under the provision of
Section 96 of the Scheme on 16.05.2025.
Page 5 of 9
Uploaded by SHARMA KUMKUM MAHENDRA(HC02349) on Tue Jun 16 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Jun 18 16:21:14 IST 2026
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/16029/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 09/06/2026
6.1. It is not in dispute that as per the statutory scheme of Section
153C of the Act, the proceedings of assessment emanate from the
‘search’ conducted under Section 132 of the Act whereas the Survey
action finds place in Section 133A of the Act. After the proceedings
under Section 153C of the Act were dropped which emanated from
search action under Section 132 of the Act, the petitioner was called
upon to face the proceedings while resorting to the provision of
Section 147 of the Act. The reopening of the assessment was
undertaken for the AY 2015-16 after dropping of the proceedings
under Section 153C of the Act by the order dated 24.12.2019. The
petitioner objected the reopening of the assessment under Section 147
of the Act by an order dated 24.12.2021. The request of the petitioner
for reopening the assessment under Section 147 of the Act was
rejected. A close scrutiny of the order dated 24.12.2021 would reveal
that the respondent authorities at various places had categorically
referred that the proceedings under Section 153C of the Act was
dropped since the same were wrongly initiated under this provision on
the basis of impounded materials found during the “survey action”
whereas Section 153C of the Act provide that the same emanate from
the searched persons and his search under Section 132 of the Act.
The relevant observation as recorded in the impugned order dated
24.12.2021 is as under:
“4.2.1 This objection is also not tenable as proceeding initiated
u/s. 153C of the I.T. Act was wrongly initiated as notice u/s.
153C of the I.T. Act was issued on the basis of impounded
materials during the survey action u/s 133A of the I.T. Act
whereas notice u/s. 153C of the I.T. Act is to be issued on the
basis of seized materials during the search action u/s. 132 of
the I.T. Act. Hence, proceedings initiated u/s. 153C of the Act
was dropped without verifying the details because of wrongly
proceedings initiated u/s. 153C of the Act instead of
proceeding u/s. 147 of the I.T. Act. Hence, now the AO has
rightly initiated proceeding u/s. 147 of the I.T. Act by issuing
notice u/s. 148 of the I.T. Act on 24.02.2021 after proper
recording reasons and getting approval of competent
Page 6 of 9
Uploaded by SHARMA KUMKUM MAHENDRA(HC02349) on Tue Jun 16 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Jun 18 16:21:14 IST 2026
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/16029/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 09/06/2026
authority.”
6.2. Thus, the aforesaid reading of the observations of the order
dated 24.12.2021 exposit that the proceedings under Section 153C of
the Act were dropped since the same were initiated without verifying
the details and instead, proceedings under Section 147 of the Act are
initiated as they emanate from the impounding material during the
“survey action” under Section 133A of the Act. The petitioner filed an
appeal challenging the aforesaid order before the appellate authority
on 23.03.2022. Subsequently, on 16.08.2024 by the Finance (No. 2)
Act of 2024, the Central Government introduced the Scheme for those
tax payers who would like to avoid the long drawn vexatious litigation
process in those cases where the income tax litigation is pending. The
petitioner accordingly filed a declaration under prescribed Form No. 1
on 31.12.2024 for settling his appeal in view of the scheme, however,
the same has been rejected by the respondent by resorting to the
provision of Section 96(a)(i) of the Scheme. The relevant section on
which reliance is placed is incorporated as under:
“96. The provisions of this Scheme shall not apply-
(a) in respect of tax arrear,
(i) relating to an assessment year in respect of
which an assessment has been made under
sub-section (3) of section 143 or section 144 or
section 147 or section 153A or section 153C of
the Income-tax Act on the basis of search
initiated under section 132 or section 132A of
the Income-tax Act;”
6.3. A bare perusal of the aforementioned provision of Section 96(a)
(i) of the Scheme will clarify that the provisions of the Scheme do not
apply in respect of the assessment which has been made under Sub-
section 3 of Section 143 or Section 144 or Section 147 or Section
153A or Section 153C of the Act, “on the basis of search initiated
under Section 132 or Section 132A of the Act”. Thus, a categorical
Page 7 of 9
Uploaded by SHARMA KUMKUM MAHENDRA(HC02349) on Tue Jun 16 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Jun 18 16:21:14 IST 2026
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/16029/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 09/06/2026
emphasis has been supplied under the provision of Section 96(a)(i) of
the Scheme denying the benefit of the Scheme in respect of the
assessments framed under the Sections emanating from the ‘search’
initiated under Section 132 or Section 132A of the Act.
6.4. In the present case, it is true that on the basis of the material
which were impounded during the “search” under Section 132 of the
Act and “survey action” under Section 133A of the Act and the
petitioner was roped into the reassessment proceedings initially by
resorting to provision of Section 153C of the Act, however, the
proceedings initiated under Section 153C of the Act were dropped by
the order dated 24.12.2019 and instead, the proceedings under
Section 147 of the Act were invoked by categorically holding that the
initial proceedings of 153C were wrongly initiated by considering it as
“search” action under Section 132 instead of “survey action” under
Section 133A of the Act. Thus, the department itself corrected its
mistake by recording that the assessment is required to be
undertaken on the basis of ‘survey’ under Section 133A of the Act
instead of search proceedings under Section 132 of the Act.
6.5. At this stage, we may mention that the reference of Section
133A of the Act is missing in the provision of Section 96(a)(i) of the
Scheme. There is no provision stipulated in the Scheme which debars
an assessee from availing the benefits of the scheme in case the
assessment is made under the provisions of Section 143(3) or Section
144 or Section 147 or Section 153A or Section 153C of the Act on the
basis of “survey action” under Section 133A of the Act. Thus, in
absence of any enabling provision restricting the claim of an assessee
of availing the benefit of the scheme in case of the “survey action”
under Section 133A of the Act, the respondent has fell in error and
has acted illegally and arbitrarily in rejecting the declaration under
the Form No. 1 of the petitioner dated 31.12.2024. The respondent
Page 8 of 9
Uploaded by SHARMA KUMKUM MAHENDRA(HC02349) on Tue Jun 16 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Jun 18 16:21:14 IST 2026
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/16029/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 09/06/2026
cannot integrate the proceedings of Section 153C emanating from
Section 132 of the Act with the proceedings of Section 147 emanating
from the “survey action” under Section 133A of the Act to deny the
benefit of the scheme by resorting to the provision of Section 96(a)(i) of
the Scheme. When the question/ issue of applicability of the Scheme
arises, the same has to be strictly considered in light of the provisions
of the Scheme, more particularly, when the assessment falls under the
categories and contingency mentioned under Section 96(a)(i) of the
Scheme. The Revenue cannot read restrictions into a statute that the
legislature never intended to include. Had the legislature intended to
exclude or restrict assessees subjected to a “survey action” under
Section 133A of the Act, such a restriction would have been explicitly
articulated in Section 96 of the Scheme. Furthermore, the rigours of a
“search action” under Section 132/132A of the Act are significantly
more severe for an assessee than those of a 'survey' under Section
133A; consequently, the two cannot be treated as legally equivalent in
the absence of express statutory language.
7. Hence, the present writ petitions succeed and the impugned
rejections dated 16.05.2025 rejecting the declaration of the petitioner
under the Scheme for the A.Y. 2015-16 and A.Y. 2016-17 are hereby
quashed and set aside. The respondent authority is directed to accept
such declarations filed by the petitioner and issue the requisite
statutory forms within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of
this order.
8. Accordingly, the present writ petitions stand allowed.
(A. S. SUPEHIA, J)
(VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI,J)
KUMKUM/39-40
Page 9 of 9
Uploaded by SHARMA KUMKUM MAHENDRA(HC02349) on Tue Jun 16 2026 Downloaded on : Thu Jun 18 16:21:14 IST 2026
Practical verification points
- Match the assessment year and statutory version.
- Separate jurisdictional, procedural, evidentiary and merits findings.
- Check appeal, review, stay and contrary binding authority after the decision date.
Questions answered
What is the reported proposition?
See the complete judgment and operative order below.
Is the complete judgment available?
Yes. The complete searchable court-copy text and a downloadable local PDF are included.
Has later appellate history been closed?
No. Later history is marked check-required and should be verified before relying on the ruling.
Source record
Retained local court copy; public URL not retained