The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S Maxis International Sdn Bhd

ID: F2J-C-2499
Court: Supreme Court of India
Case number: SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 52466/2025
Decision date: 2025-11-28
DISPOSED

Finin2min decision brief

Supreme Court of India ruling in SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 52466/2025. Operative-order extract: Pending applications including application seeking condonation of delay in filing shall stand disposed of.

Why this ruling matters

This page provides the complete searchable court text, source provenance and operative-order context for a current income-tax ruling. Application depends on the assessment year, statutory text and binding jurisdiction.

Editorial control: The complete court text below controls. Later appellate history is marked Check required and has not been inferred.

Complete judgment

Download complete local reference PDF

Read complete searchable court text
[Cites 1, Cited by 0] Supreme Court - Daily Orders The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S Maxis International Sdn Bhd on 28 November, 2025 ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.4 SECTION IV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 52466/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27-09-2024 in WA No. 1385/2024 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru] THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S MAXIS INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. IA No. 293878/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 293879/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING/CURING THE DEFECTS) Date : 28-11-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. S Dwarakanath, A.S.G. Ms. Madhulika Upadhyay, AOR Ms. Pallavi Garg, Adv. Mr. Sidharth Yadav, Adv. Mr. Digvijay Dam, Adv. Mr. Rajat Vaishnaw, Adv. For Respondent(s) : UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1. There is gross delay of 260 days in filing the Special Leave Petition. 2. Delay in refiling is condoned. 3. Following the order dated 26.07.2024 passed in SLP (C) Diary No.24154/2024 (Deputy Director of Income Tax and Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by RADHA SHARMA Date: 2025.11.29 Anr. Vs. M/s. Vodafone Idea Ltd.), we dismiss this 12:16:04 IST Reason: Special Leave Petition. 1 4. We fail to understand as to why the Department is continuously filing Special Leave Petitions such as the present one despite the orders passed earlier by this Court dismissing similar Special Leave Petitions following the decision of this Court in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and Another, reported in (2022) 3 SCC 321. Further, the Review Petition filed as against the aforesaid judgment has also been dismissed by a three-Judge Bench. 5. We also wish to observe that once the Special Leave Petition has been dismissed by the Supreme Court based on an earlier judgment of this Court, there ought not to be any more petitions filed by the Department which will in any case be dismissed based on the earlier judgment of this Court. We say so for the reason that filing of such frivolous cases will only add to the pendency of this Court and to docket explosion and lead to waste of judicial time. 6. Pending applications including application seeking condonation of delay in filing shall stand disposed of. (RADHA SHARMA) (DIVYA BABBAR) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) 2

Practitioner verification checklist

Questions answered

What did the court decide?

Supreme Court of India ruling in SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 52466/2025. Operative-order extract: Pending applications including application seeking condonation of delay in filing shall stand disposed of.

Which case and court does this page cover?

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 52466/2025, decided by Supreme Court of India on 2025-11-28.

Is the complete judgment available?

Yes. The complete searchable public court text appears on this page and in the downloadable local reference PDF.

What should be checked before relying on this ruling?

Verify the assessment year, applicable statutory text, territorial and appellate jurisdiction, and any later appeal, review, stay or contrary binding authority.

Source details

Public searchable court-copy reproduction
Official Supreme Court of India portal

Official-source status: court portal identified; a judgment-specific stable official deep link is not asserted unless supplied by the court portal.