The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M.Janakiraman

[Cites 2, Cited by 0] Madras High Court The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M.Janakiraman on 2 January, 2019 Author: T.S.Sivagnanam Bench: T.S.Sivagnanam, N. Sathish Kumar 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 02.01.2019 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR Tax Case Appeal No.67 of 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle XIII, Chennai .... Appellant -vs- M.Janakiraman ... Respondent Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'B' Bench, Chennai, dated 13.08.2010 in M.A.No.135/Mds/2010 (in I.T.(SS) A.No.63/Mds/05). For Appellant : Mr.T.R.SenthilKumar Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent : Mr.A.Thayaparan http://www.judis.nic.in 2 JUDGMENT Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S.Sivagnanam, J. This appeal by the appellant/Revenue is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai dated 13.08.2010 in M.A.No.135/Mds/2010 (in I.T.(SS) A.No.63/Mds/05). 2. Heard Mr.T.R.SenthilKumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant/Revenue and Mr.A.Thayaparan, learned counsel for the respondent. 3. This Appeal has been admitted on the following Substantial Question of Law:- "1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in finding that the assessment orders under Section 158 BD are without assumption of valid jurisdiction and needs to be quashed in violation of the legal principles laid down by jurisdictional High Court in T.C.(A) No.564/2004? 2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal has jurisdiction to pass an order contrary to its earlier order dated 07.12.2007 and finding on the ground of rectification?" http://www.judis.nic.in 3 4. We have perused the order of Assessment as well as the Order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax and we find that the tax effect in this appeal is lesser than the threshold limit mentioned in Circular No.3 of 2018, dated 11.07.2018, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, which fixes the monetary limit as Rs.50,00,000/- for the Department to pursue the matter. Furthermore, the Revenue has not been able to point out any distinguishing features, by which the Circular No.3 of 2018, dated 11.07.2018, cannot be applied. 5. Thus, for the above reasons, the Revenue cannot pursue this Appeal in view of the low tax effect. Hence, the Appeal is dismissed and the Substantial Questions of Law, framed for consideration, are left open. No costs. The Revenue is at liberty to seek for restoration of appeal, if at a later point of time, it is found that the tax effect is above the threshold limit. [T.S.S.,J.] [N.S.K.,J.] 02.01.2019 svki http://www.judis.nic.in 4 To The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'B' Bench Chennai. http://www.judis.nic.in 5 T.S. SIVAGNANAM J. AND N.SATHISH KUMAR,J. (svki) T.C.A.No.67 of 2011 02.01.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in