The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I vs M/S. Chentech Computers Services P Ltd

ID: F2J-C-2638
Court: Madras High Court
Case number: T.C.A.Nos.481 and 482 of 2011
Decision date: 2022-08-29
Outcome: DISMISSED

Finin2min decision brief

Madras High Court ruling in T.C.A.Nos.481 and 482 of 2011. Operative-order extract: In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant / Revenue, the present appeals, wherein, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed, are dismissed as Page 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.Nos.481 and 482 of 2011 withdrawn, keeping open the substantial questions of law for determination in appropriate cases.

Why this ruling matters

This page provides the complete searchable court text, source provenance and operative-order context for a current income-tax ruling. Application depends on the assessment year, statutory text and binding jurisdiction.

Editorial control: The complete court text below controls. Later appellate history is marked CHECK_REQUIRED and has not been inferred.

Complete judgment

Download complete local reference PDF

Read complete searchable court text
[Cites 3, Cited by 0] Madras High Court The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I vs M/S. Chentech Computers Services P Ltd on 29 August, 2022 Author: R.Mahadevan Bench: R. Mahadevan, Mohammed Shaffiq T.C.A.Nos.481 and 482 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.08.2022 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ T.C.A.Nos.481 and 482 of 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chennai. ... Appellant in both TCAs Versus M/s. Chentech Computers Services P Ltd., No.75A, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. ... Respondent in both TCAs Appeals preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order dated 18.04.2011 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Chennai, in I.T.A.Nos.216 and 217/Mds/2011. For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Standing Counsel in both TCAs For Respondent : Mr.R.Sivaraman in both TCAs Page 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.Nos.481 and 482 of 2011 COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.MAHADEVAN, J.) These tax case appeals have been filed by the appellant / Revenue, challenging the common order dated 18.04.2011 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Chennai, in I.T.A.Nos.216 and 217/Mds/2011, relating to the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08. 2. By order dated 21.11.2011, this court admitted the aforesaid tax case appeals on the following substantial questions of law: “(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in deleting the addition of interest accrued but not received on loans advanced, even though the assessee was following the mercantile system of accounting as required under the Company Law? (ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee was entitled to follow the hybrid system of accounting, by showing the interest on sticky loans on receipt basis, while otherwise following the mercantile system of accounting, contrary to the provisions of Section 145 of Income Tax Act? Page 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.Nos.481 and 482 of 2011 (iii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that interest could be shown for income tax purposes on receipt basis, ignoring the special provisions contained in Section 43D of the Income Tax Act and Rules made there under specifying the class of assessees and categories of had and doubtful debts in respect of which such exclusion could be made?" 3. When the matters were taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the appellant / Revenue brought to the notice of this court the Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes, wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore). It is also submitted that the tax effect in these appeals is less than the threshold limit. 4. In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant / Revenue, the present appeals, wherein, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed, are dismissed as Page 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.Nos.481 and 482 of 2011 withdrawn, keeping open the substantial questions of law for determination in appropriate cases. No costs. (R.M.D., J.) (M.S.Q., J.) 29.08.2022 Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No av To 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Chennai. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Chennai. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle - I(3), Chennai - 600 034. 4. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-III, Chennai. Page 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.Nos.481 and 482 of 2011 R. MAHADEVAN, J. and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. av T.C.A.Nos.481 and 482 of 2011 29.08.2022 Page 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Practitioner verification checklist

Questions answered

What did the court decide?

Madras High Court ruling in T.C.A.Nos.481 and 482 of 2011. Operative-order extract: In the light of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant / Revenue, the present appeals, wherein, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed, are dismissed as Page 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.C.A.Nos.481 and 482 of 2011 withdrawn, keeping open the substantial questions of law for determination in appropriate cases.

Which case and court does this page cover?

T.C.A.Nos.481 and 482 of 2011, decided by Madras High Court on 2022-08-29.

Is the complete judgment available?

Yes. The complete searchable public court text appears on this page and in the downloadable local reference PDF.

What should be checked before relying on this ruling?

Verify the assessment year, applicable statutory text, territorial and appellate jurisdiction, and any later appeal, review, stay or contrary binding authority.

Source details

Public searchable court-copy reproduction
Official Madras High Court portal

Official-source status: court portal identified; a judgment-specific stable official deep link is not asserted unless supplied by the court portal.