Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Dinesh N. Thacker

ID: F2J-C-2629
Court: Calcutta High Court
Case number: ITAT 130 of 2015
Decision date: 2015-09-16
Outcome: ALLOWED

Finin2min decision brief

Calcutta High Court ruling in ITAT 130 of 2015. Operative-order extract: The application for condonation of delay is allowed.

Why this ruling matters

This page provides the complete searchable court text, source provenance and operative-order context for a current income-tax ruling. Application depends on the assessment year, statutory text and binding jurisdiction.

Editorial control: The complete court text below controls. Later appellate history is marked CHECK_REQUIRED and has not been inferred.

Complete judgment

Download complete local reference PDF

Read complete searchable court text

[Cites 0, Cited by 0] Calcutta High Court Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Dinesh N. Thacker on 16 September, 2015 Author: Soumitra Pal Bench: Soumitra Pal ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax] ORIGINAL SIDE GA 2913 of 2015 ITAT 130 of 2015 GA 2914 of 2015 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-1, KOLKATA Versus DINESH N. THACKER BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL The Hon'ble JUSTICE ISHAN CHANDRA DAS Date : 16th September, 2015. Mr. Udayan Chakraborty, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Das, Adv. The Court : The application, being GA 2913 of 2015, for condoning the delay of 114 days in preferring the appeal, is taken up for hearing. Perused the application. Heard Mr. Chakraborty, learned advocate for the appellant and Mr. Das, learned advocate for the respondent. Causes shown are sufficient. Therefore, the delay of 114 days in preferring the appeal is condoned. Let the appeal be registered, if it is otherwise in form. The application for condonation of delay is allowed. Let the stay application, being GA 2914/2015 along with ITAT 130/2015, appear in the list under the same heading on 23rd September, 2015. (SOUMITRA PAL, J.) (ISHAN CHANDRA DAS, J.) sm

Practitioner verification checklist

Confirm the assessment year and the statutory version considered.
Separate the binding ratio from fact-specific findings and procedural directions.
Check territorial jurisdiction, appealability and any later stay, review or reversal.
Reconcile cited sections and monetary thresholds with the law applicable to the user’s period.

Questions answered

What did the court decide?

Calcutta High Court ruling in ITAT 130 of 2015. Operative-order extract: The application for condonation of delay is allowed.

Which case and court does this page cover?

ITAT 130 of 2015, decided by Calcutta High Court on 2015-09-16.

Is the complete judgment available?

Yes. The complete searchable public court text appears on this page and in the downloadable local reference PDF.

What should be checked before relying on this ruling?

Verify the assessment year, applicable statutory text, territorial and appellate jurisdiction, and any later appeal, review, stay or contrary binding authority.

Source details

Public searchable court-copy reproduction
Official Calcutta High Court portal

Official-source status: court portal identified; a judgment-specific stable official deep link is not asserted unless supplied by the court portal.