FININ2MINJudgment Intelligence

Dedhia Music Foundation v. CIT(E)

Important disclaimer

Finin2min Judgment Intelligence is provided for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal, tax, accounting, investment or other professional advice and is not a substitute for advice on the user's specific facts. The Finin2min summary, Q&A, reliance profile, fact-match indicators, comparisons and practical takeaways are editorial analysis and are not part of the Court/Tribunal judgment. Before citing, filing, advising or acting on a case, read the complete official judgment/order, verify the cause title, case number, coram, date, applicable statutory text and jurisdiction, and check subsequent appellate history, review/SLP status and later amendments. A similar fact pattern does not guarantee the same outcome. No advocate-client, CA-client or other professional relationship is created by use of this page.

ITATQuashed Or Set AsideFull text available; primary replacement pendingLater-history check open
Source status: Sanitized readable full judgment copy packaged; official primary replacement pending. Open full judgment PDF. Verify against the issuing court/tribunal record before legal reliance.

Case in 2 minutes

The reported order concerns renewal/fresh registration of an organisation promoting Indian classical music and says registration cannot be refused merely because objects contain broad enabling clauses if the actual charitable character is otherwise established.

Case snapshot

Court / TribunalITAT Mumbai
Case numberITA Nos. 743 & 744/Mum/2025
Decision date2025-04-02
Assessment yearAY 2024-25
Law familyIncome Tax
OutcomeQuashed Or Set Aside

Sections / provisions: 12AB

Questions before the Court / Tribunal

  • Charitable registration where objects include broad enabling clauses: The reported order concerns renewal/fresh registration of an organisation promoting Indian classical music and says registration cannot be refused merely because objects contain broad enabling clauses if the actual charitable character is otherwise established.
SOURCE-DRIVEN CASE RECORD - condensed from the packaged judgment copy

Material facts and background

The assessee was initially granted provisional registration u/s. 12AB as well as u/s 80G of the Act on 29-01-2024 from AYs. 2024-25 to 2026-27. Thereafter, the assessee filed prescribed applications seeking permanent registration u/s.12AB and 80G of the Act. Both the applications filed by the assessee were rejected by the Ld. CIT(E). Hence, the assessee has filed these appeals before the Tribunal. 4.

performance, travel and recording, Organize festivals and conferences that bring together Indian Classical musicians and scholars from around the world.” means the assessee intends to utilise the funds outside India while bringing musicians and scholars from outside India to participate in conferences and festivals organized by the assessee. Such objects leave room for any potential future endeavour may be undertaken by the assessee trust which would require expenditure outside India. Further, the assessee has not presented/submitted any documentary evidence/proof of passing the resolution regarding amendment in trust deed nor has it provided any proof that it has initiated the process for amendment in trust deed/MoA before the competent authority. Additionally, proof of activities submitted by the assessee are not justified by the proof of expenses submitted by it. The assessee has submitted expenses of advertisement in newspaper which do not reflect that the activities undertaken by the assessee are charitable in nature. Further, the assessee has submitted any documentary evidence which establishes that the music concerts organized by the assessee are a work of charity or in the...

Appellant / assessee submissions

The judgment copy does not separately set out this component in a distinct section; refer to the full order and the reasoning section below.

Revenue / respondent submissions

The judgment copy does not separately set out this component in a distinct section; refer to the full order and the reasoning section below.

Court / Tribunal analysis and reasoning

extract below the relevant portion of the decision rendered by the coordinate bench in the above cited case:“6. We have heard both the parties. The issue before us relates to grant of registration u/s 12AA of the Act, for the purposes of claiming exemption u/s 11 & 12 of the Act of incomes applied for charitable purposes. 7. The applicant assessee in the present case has been denied registration for the reason that its incidental and ancillary objects included carrying out the activities outside the India. The Ld.CIT(E) has held that for the aforesaid reason the assessee cannot be said to be indulging in charitable activities. And for holding so he has referred to the provisions of section 11(1)(c) of the Act. 8. The primary argument of the assessee against the order of the Ld.CIT(E) is that for the purposes of granting registration only the conditions mentioned in section 12AA need to be fulfilled and the provisions of section 11(1)(c) are not relevant for the said purpose, being applicable only while determining the income entitled to exemption u/s 11 of the Act. That in any case carrying out charitable activities outside India was not the sole or main object but only...

"S. 2(15) (15) Charitable purpose includes relief of the poor, education, [yoga,] medical relief, [preservation of environment (including water-sheds, forests and wildlife) and preservation of monuments or places or objects of artistic or historic interest,] and the advancement of any other object of general public utility. [Provided that the advancement of any other object of general public utility shall not be a charitable purpose, if it involves the carrying on of any activity in the nature of trade, commerce or business, of any activity of rendering any service in relation to any trade, commerce or business, for a cess or fee or any other consideration, irrespective of the nature of use of application, or retention, of the income from such activity, unless— (i) such activity is undertaken in the course of actual carrying out of such advancement of any other object of general public utility and (ii) the aggregate receipts from such activity or activities during the previous year, do not exceed twenty per cent of the total receipts, of the trust or institution undertaking such activity or activities, of that previous year;]" 11. As is evident from the above, the section lists...

only once registration is granted u/s 12A of the Act and therefore cannot be relevant for the purposes of granting registration u/s 12A of the Act. The scheme of the Act is that all entities carrying out charitable activities, as defined in section 2(15) of the Act, qualify to be registered as charitable entities subject to satisfaction of the concerned officer vis-a-vis their objects and activities, but the exemption is provided/restricted only to the extent of income which is applied for charitable purpose in India. 15. The issue we find, is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decisions relied upon by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee before us. In the case of MK Nambyar SAARC Law Charitable Trust (supra), we find, the application for grant of registration was rejected on the ground that the applicant itself had admitted that the scholarship could be paid to members even outside India. The Hon'ble High Court held that the application of income outside India is not a relevant criteria for rejecting the application for grant of registration u/s 12AA of the Act and the officer has to only restrict himself to the satisfaction about the objects and genuineness of the...

(b)****** (c )income derived from property held under trust— ( i)created on or after the 1st day of April, 1952, for a charitable purpose which tends to promote international welfare in which India is interested, to the extent to which such income is applied to such purposes outside India, and (ii )for charitable or religious purposes, created before the 1st day of April, 1952, to the extent to which such income is applied to such purposes outside India ; Provided that the Board, by general or special order, has directed in either case that it shall not be included in the total income of the person in receipt of such income; (d)****** 3. So far as the benefit of section 11(1)(a) is concerned, it can be extended only to the extent to which such income is applied to such purposes in India. However, if the income is applied to the purposes outside India, then clause (c) will be applicable and if the permission is granted by the Board either by general or special order then, benefit can be extended. Section 12AA prescribes the procedure for registration. Reading the section, it becomes clear that after the application is made, the officer has to call for documents or information from...

Operative decision and relief

trust or institution shall be applied outside India. Even if it is applied outside India, then the assessee, subject to sec. 11(c) of the Act, would not get exemption of the income so applied u/s 11 of the Act. Hence the Ld CIT(E) was not justified in rejecting the application of the on apprehension entertained by him. 17. The second reasoning given by the assessee is that the expenses incurred by the assessee do not prove the activities carried on by it. In this regard, the Ld A.R submitted that the assessee has filed required documents before Ld CIT(E). He further submitted that the assessee has also furnished additional evidences relating to the activities carried on by the assessee.

evidences may be admitted and the assessee may be provided with an opportunity to present all the details before Ld CIT(E) to prove the activities carried on by it. 17.1. We find merit in the prayer of the assessee. We notice that the observations made by Ld CIT(E) with regard to activities is general in nature, i.e., the Ld CIT(E) did not state the deficiencies noticed by him in the documents furnished by the assessee. Further, the assessee has furnished additional evidences in order to satisfy Ld CIT(E) with regard to the genuineness of activities. Accordingly, in the interest of natural justice, we admit the additional evidences furnished by the assessee. 18. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order passed by Ld CIT(E) rejecting the application filed by the assessee seeking

registration u/s 12AB of the Act and restore all the issues to his file with the direction to process the application of the assessee again afresh in the light of discussions made supra.

Authorities and precedents appearing in the judgment

  • Sarbat The Bhala Gurmat Mission Charitable Trust v. CIT(E)

This list is machine-assisted from the judgment text and is not a substitute for checking the full citation chain in the PDF.

FININ2MIN ANALYSIS

Ratio and legal principle

The decision turns on Charitable registration where objects include broad enabling clauses. The operative result is classified as Quashed Or Set Aside. Read the rule only with the statutory version, factual findings and precedent chain recorded in the full judgment.

Why this judgment matters

The case is relevant to taxpayers, advisers and litigators dealing with Charitable registration where objects include broad enabling clauses. Its practical value lies in the interaction between the statutory text, the evidentiary record and the procedural route followed in this case.

Practitioner action points

  • Keep registration, audit-report, Form 10/10B/10BB and filing timestamps together; many exemption disputes are procedural and depend on when the form existed versus when it was uploaded.
  • For litigation, attach the full judgment/order to the working paper and cite the paragraph/page supporting the proposition rather than relying on a headnote alone.

Do not over-read this case

  • The packaged PDF is not yet an issuing-authority certified copy
  • Apply the statutory law applicable to the relevant year; later amendments can change the result.
  • Check whether a later High Court or Supreme Court judgment has affirmed, distinguished, reversed or superseded this decision.

Finin2min Judgment Intelligence

Decision support built around the judgment: reliance, fact match, Q&A, section impact, related-case network and practical next steps.

Compare this caseBrowse by section

Can I rely on this judgment?

Authority levelITAT
Reliance effectTribunal precedent. Persuasive for similar facts; subject to the jurisdictional High Court and Supreme Court. Coordinate-Bench discipline should be checked.
Source integrityA sanitized local full-text judgment copy is packaged; official-primary replacement remains pending.
Subsequent historySubsequent appellate history is not fully closed in the current ledger. Recheck before filing or opinion work.
Finin2min statusLater-history check open

Does this case match your facts?

Stronger match when

  • Your dispute raises the same core issue: Charitable registration where objects include broad enabling clauses.
  • The same statutory provisions or materially equivalent provisions apply: 12AB.
  • Your matter is at a comparable the same procedural and factual stage stage.
  • Your documentary/evidentiary record is materially similar to the facts the ITAT Mumbai considered: The assessee was initially granted provisional registration u/s.
  • The same legal regime or assessment-period rules relevant to AY 2024-25 apply to your matter.

Weaker / distinguishable when

  • A later Supreme Court or jurisdictional High Court ruling changes the legal position.
  • The statutory provision was amended for your year or transaction.
  • Your evidence, transaction structure, notice chronology or procedural stage differs on a fact the judgment treated as material.
  • The case succeeded on a narrow jurisdictional/procedural defect that the authority has cured in your matter.

Questions this judgment answers

What was the main dispute in Dedhia Music Foundation?

The reported order concerns renewal/fresh registration of an organisation promoting Indian classical music and says registration cannot be refused merely because objects contain broad enabling clauses if the actual charitable character is otherwise established.

Which facts mattered most to the result?

The assessee was initially granted provisional registration u/s. 12AB as well as u/s 80G of the Act on 29-01-2024 from AYs. 2024-25 to 2026-27.

What did the ITAT Mumbai ultimately decide?

trust or institution shall be applied outside India. Even if it is applied outside India, then the assessee, subject to sec. 11(c) of the Act, would not get exemption of the income so applied u/s 11 of the Act.

What legal principle can be taken from this judgment?

The decision turns on Charitable registration where objects include broad enabling clauses. The operative result is classified as Quashed Or Set Aside. Read the rule only with the statutory version, factual findings and precedent chain recorded in the full judgment.

Which provisions should be checked before relying on the case?

The case engages 12AB. The relevant statutory version for AY 2024-25 should be checked together with any later amendment, notification, circular and controlling higher-court authority.

When is this judgment most useful to a taxpayer or adviser?

The case is relevant to taxpayers, advisers and litigators dealing with Charitable registration where objects include broad enabling clauses . Its practical value lies in the interaction between the statutory text, the evidentiary record and the procedural route followed in this case.

What could make this judgment distinguishable or unsafe to rely on?

The packaged PDF is not yet an issuing-authority certified copy Apply the statutory law applicable to the relevant year; later amendments can change the result. Check whether a later High Court or Supreme Court judgment has affirmed, distinguished, reversed or superseded this decision.

Can this judgment be cited as current law without another check?

Tribunal precedent. Persuasive for similar facts; subject to the jurisdictional High Court and Supreme Court. Coordinate-Bench discipline should be checked. Subsequent appellate history is not fully closed in the current ledger. Recheck before filing or opinion work. A sanitized local full-text judgment copy is packaged; official-primary replacement remains pending.

Section / provision impact

  • 12AB — 12AB is part of the statutory framework considered in the context of charitable registration where objects include broad enabling clauses. Read the exact provision applicable to the relevant year with the Court/Tribunal reasoning.

How the decision changes your analysis

1. Frame the issue

Before using this authority, frame the issue under 12AB and identify the decisive facts/evidence. The result should not be assumed from the case title alone.

2. This judgment

The decision turns on Charitable registration where objects include broad enabling clauses. The operative result is classified as Quashed Or Set Aside. Read the rule only with the statutory version, factual findings and precedent chain recorded in the full judgment.

3. Current use

Tribunal precedent. Persuasive for similar facts; subject to the jurisdictional High Court and Supreme Court. Coordinate-Bench discipline should be checked. Subsequent appellate history is not fully closed in the current ledger. Recheck before filing or opinion work.

Case network: similar and different outcomes

Authorities appearing in this judgment: Sarbat The Bhala Gurmat Mission Charitable Trust v. CIT(E)

Closest related cases in the Finin2min repository

Related cases with a different result

Related-case links are repository similarity connections, not a claim that one judgment cites or overrules another. Use the cited-authority list and later-history check for formal precedent analysis.

Working-paper citation

Dedhia Music Foundation v. CIT(E), ITA Nos. 743 & 744/Mum/2025, ITAT Mumbai, decided 2025-04-02

Full judgment and source trail

Read / download the clean local judgment copy

Packaged source classSANITIZED_LOCAL_FULL_JUDGMENT_COPY_PRIMARY_PENDING
Pages25
SHA-256f9c2adde9a64907cbddf8b5153b7512fcad82c28be6b6977c50240f8f65a5d54
Original source URLNot exposed publicly. Original provenance retained only in the private source-closure ledger.
Source authenticationSanitized local full-text copy - official primary replacement pending

Related Finin2min guidance