Skip to main content
Finin2min
Ind AS Hub
Home › Ind AS Hub › Ind AS 32
Ind AS Master SeriesBatch 06Paragraph-linked analysis

Ind AS 32
Financial Instruments: Presentation

Reviewed by CA Nikhil Gupta · Last reviewed 29 June 2026

Ind AS 32 – Financial Instruments Presentation (Extended)

Liability versus equity, compound instruments, treasury shares and offsetting. Establish principles for presenting financial instruments as liabilities or equity and for offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities.

⏱ 90–120 min● Reviewed: 26 June 2026● Professional + CA Final
Standard orientation

What Ind AS 32 is designed to achieve

Establish principles for presenting financial instruments as liabilities or equity and for offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities.

Scope: Applies to most recognised and unrecognised financial instruments, subject to exclusions for consolidated interests, employee benefits, insurance contracts, share-based payments and specified own-use contracts. Recognition, measurement and disclosure are principally addressed by Ind AS 109 and Ind AS 107.

Liability test

A contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial asset generally creates a liability.

Equity test

A residual interest with no contractual delivery obligation can qualify as equity.

Own equity

Derivative equity classification generally requires fixed amount of cash for fixed number of own shares.

Offsetting

Allowed only with a current legally enforceable set-off right and intention to settle net or simultaneously.

Reading method: Requirements are paraphrased and grouped where they form one integrated rule. Apply the current notified text for final conclusions.
Full standard map

Paragraph-by-paragraph register

ParagraphsRequirement and simple decode
1–3Objective and scope
Explains presentation objectives and the relationship with Ind AS 109 and Ind AS 107.
4Scope exclusions
Excludes specified subsidiaries/associates/JVs, employee-benefit rights, insurance contracts, share-based payments and certain reimbursement rights.
5–7Own-use contracts
Contracts to buy or sell non-financial items are outside the standard only when entered into and held for expected purchase, sale or usage requirements; net-settlement features can bring them into scope.
8–10Written options and settlement practice
A contract can be within scope when it permits net cash settlement, routine net settlement, ready convertibility to cash or delivery for dealer profit-taking.
11Core definitions
Defines financial instrument, financial asset, financial liability, equity instrument and fair value.
13–14Substance over legal form
Classify on contractual substance at initial recognition, not legal label or management intention.
15–16Basic liability and equity principle
An obligation to deliver cash/another asset or exchange on potentially unfavourable terms is a liability; equity is a residual interest.
16A–16BPuttable instruments exception
A puttable instrument can be equity only when it meets all narrowly specified conditions and has no disqualifying features.
16C–16DObligations arising only on liquidation
Certain pro-rata liquidation instruments can be equity when all strict conditions are met.
16E–16FReclassification of exception instruments
Reclassify prospectively when an instrument starts or ceases to meet the puttable/liquidation exception.
17–20No contractual obligation and settlement discretion
Economic compulsion alone is not a contractual obligation; issuer discretion over distributions and redemption is critical.
21–24Settlement in own equity instruments
A non-derivative requiring delivery of a variable number of shares is generally a liability; a derivative is equity only when the fixed-for-fixed condition is met, subject to specific exceptions.
22ARights issues exception
Certain pro-rata rights/options denominated in any currency can be equity when offered to all existing owners of the same class.
23Obligation to purchase own equity
A forward purchase or written put over own shares creates a financial liability for the redemption amount, with equity debited.
24Contingent settlement in own equity
Classification follows whether settlement exposes the issuer to delivering a variable value or otherwise fails equity conditions.
25Contingent settlement provisions
A contingent cash-settlement feature normally creates a liability unless the contingency is not genuine, occurs only on liquidation or another narrow condition is met.
26Settlement alternatives
If one settlement alternative results in liability classification, the instrument is generally a financial asset or liability unless all alternatives qualify as equity.
28–32Compound financial instruments
Separate liability and equity components of instruments such as convertible debt at initial recognition; do not revise the split later merely because conversion probability changes.
31–32Measurement of components
Measure the liability first at fair value without the equity conversion feature; assign the residual to equity.
33–34Treasury shares
Deduct reacquired own equity instruments from equity. No gain or loss is recognised in P&L on purchase, sale, issue or cancellation.
35–36Interest, dividends, gains and losses
Liability-related returns are income/expense; equity distributions are recognised directly in equity, net of related tax effects.
37–38Transaction costs
Deduct incremental costs of an equity transaction from equity; allocate compound-issue costs to liability and equity components.
40–41Income-tax and distributable-profit effects
Apply Ind AS 12 to tax effects; legal availability of distributable reserves does not determine accounting classification.
42Offsetting principle
Offset only when there is a current legally enforceable set-off right and intention to settle net or realise and settle simultaneously.
43–50Offsetting application
Distinguishes net presentation from derecognition and explains simultaneous settlement, master netting agreements, collateral and multiple counterparties.
AG1–AG14Application guidance—definitions and scope
Explains monetary items, contractual rights, physical assets, executory contracts and economic benefits.
AG25–AG29AApplication guidance—classification
Addresses preference shares, distributions, redemption, puttable instruments and members’ shares in co-operatives.
AG30–AG35Application guidance—own equity derivatives
Provides fixed-for-fixed and settlement examples.
AG36–AG39Application guidance—compound instruments and treasury shares
Explains component measurement and presentation.
AG38A–AG38FApplication guidance—offsetting
Clarifies enforceability in normal business and default, and gross settlement systems equivalent to net settlement.
Major areas decoded

Technical requirements in simple language

Legal label is not decisive

Redeemable preference shares can be liabilities even when company law calls them share capital. Conversely, qualifying perpetual instruments can be equity.

Fixed-for-fixed discipline

A conversion option fails equity classification when either the cash amount or number of shares varies, unless a specific exception applies.

Compound instruments

Convertible bonds are split once at inception. Subsequent finance cost uses the effective interest rate on the liability component.

Puttable exception

The exception is narrow and requires the instrument to be the most subordinated class, share net assets pro rata and meet other conditions.

Treasury shares

Own-share transactions never generate accounting gains or losses. Consideration and directly attributable costs remain within equity.

Offsetting is rare

A master netting agreement alone is insufficient. The right must be currently enforceable and the entity must intend net or simultaneous settlement.

Foreign-currency rights issues

The rights issue exception can preserve equity classification when offered pro rata to all holders of the same class.

Visual learning

Finin2min decision map

Finin2min Ind AS 32 decision map

Editable SVG and high-resolution PNG versions are included in the batch assets.

Exceptions and highlights

What professionals frequently overlook

  • Economic pressure to redeem is not itself a contractual obligation, though the contract may still create one.
  • Issuer discretion over dividends supports equity only when no other cash-delivery obligation exists.
  • Puttable and liquidation-only equity exceptions have cumulative conditions and are not broad exemptions.
  • A variable-share settlement obligation is usually a liability even though settlement uses own shares.
  • Contingent settlement features can create liabilities even when the triggering event is outside both parties’ control.
  • Treasury shares are deducted from equity and never treated as financial assets.
  • Offsetting criteria are assessed at reporting date and across relevant legal jurisdictions.
  • Collateral and a master netting agreement do not automatically justify balance-sheet offsetting.
Practical application

Transaction examples

Fact pattern
Treatment
Reason
Redeemable preference shares with mandatory redemption
Financial liability
The issuer must deliver cash.
Perpetual preference shares with fully discretionary dividends
Potential equity
There may be no contractual cash obligation.
Convertible debenture with fixed conversion ratio
Compound instrument
Separate liability and equity components.
Written put requiring repurchase of own shares
Financial liability
Recognise present value of redemption amount.
Reacquisition of own shares
Deduct from equity
No P&L gain or loss.
Receivable and payable under master netting agreement
Usually present gross
Offset only if both paragraph 42 criteria are met.
Accounting mechanics

Illustrative journal entries

Entries are simplified and may require tax, foreign-exchange or presentation adjustments.

Issue of compound instrument

Dr Cash Cr Financial liability — present value Cr Equity — conversion option

Finance cost on liability component

Dr Finance cost Cr Financial liability

Purchase of treasury shares

Dr Treasury shares / Equity Cr Cash

Written put over own shares

Dr Equity Cr Financial liability — redemption amount
CA / finance / boardroom cases

Applied case studies

1. Redeemable preference share

Applied case

An instrument pays discretionary dividends but is mandatorily redeemable for ₹100 crore after five years.

Finin2min analysis: The redemption obligation creates a liability. Discretionary dividends do not convert the redemption principal into equity.

2. Variable share settlement

Applied case

A bond is settled by issuing shares equal to ₹50 crore at settlement-date market price.

Finin2min analysis: It is a financial liability because the entity delivers a variable number of shares equal to a fixed value.

3. Convertible bond

Applied case

₹1,000 crore debt converts into a fixed number of shares at holder option. Similar non-convertible debt yields 10%.

Finin2min analysis: Measure the liability using the 10% market yield and recognise the residual proceeds in equity.

4. Netting arrangement

Applied case

Two banks have reciprocal balances and a master agreement enforceable only on default. They normally settle gross.

Finin2min analysis: Present gross because there is no current enforceable right in normal circumstances and no net-settlement intention.

5. Puttable fund units

Applied case

Fund units are redeemable at net asset value and are the most subordinated identical class.

Finin2min analysis: They may qualify for the narrow puttable equity exception only if every condition in paragraphs 16A–16B is met.
Global comparison

Ind AS versus IFRS and US GAAP

TopicInd ASIFRSUS GAAP
Redeemable instrumentsLiability/equity follows contractual obligation, with narrow puttable exceptions.Broadly aligned with IAS 32.US GAAP may present certain redeemable instruments in temporary/mezzanine equity.
Convertible debtSplit liability and equity when fixed-for-fixed equity component exists.Broadly aligned.US GAAP conversion-feature separation rules differ and have been simplified for many instruments.
Own-share putRecognise liability and debit equity.Broadly aligned.US GAAP classification and measurement differ.
Treasury sharesEquity deduction; no P&L.Broadly aligned.Cost or par-value methods within equity.
OffsettingStrict right-and-intention test.Broadly aligned.US GAAP permits broader offsetting for some derivatives and repo arrangements.
Implementation lens

Implications for key stakeholders

CFO / Treasury

Review term sheets before issuance and model leverage consequences.

Legal

Confirm enforceability, settlement alternatives and netting rights.

Tax

Assess deductible returns and deferred-tax effects without driving classification.

Investor relations

Explain liability/equity classification and non-cash finance costs.

Audit committee

Challenge structured terms, side letters and offsetting judgements.

Quality-control watchlist

Common errors and exam traps

  1. Classifying by legal name rather than contractual substance.
  2. Treating mandatory redeemable preference shares as equity.
  3. Ignoring variable-share settlement.
  4. Failing to separate a convertible instrument at inception.
  5. Remeasuring the equity component after initial recognition.
  6. Recognising treasury-share gains in P&L.
  7. Offsetting based only on a master netting agreement.
  8. Ignoring contingent settlement clauses.
  9. Treating economic compulsion as automatically contractual.
  10. Failing to allocate issue costs between compound components.
Finin2min Q&A

Frequently asked questions

1. Are preference shares always equity?
No. Mandatory redemption or non-discretionary returns can create liabilities.
2. What is fixed-for-fixed?
A derivative exchanges a fixed amount of cash or another financial asset for a fixed number of own equity instruments.
3. Can treasury shares be assets?
No. They are deducted from equity.
4. When can balances be offset?
Only with a current enforceable set-off right and net/simultaneous settlement intention.
5. Is a convertible bond always compound?
Only when it contains both a liability component and an equity conversion feature.
6. Does tax classification determine Ind AS classification?
No.
Two-minute revision

Finin2min cheat sheet

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION? → LIABILITY · RESIDUAL + FIXED-FOR-FIXED? → EQUITY · BOTH? → SPLIT · OFFSET ONLY IF RIGHT + INTENT
Updated 4 October 2026

October 2026 update: Ind AS 32: Financial Instruments Presentation - Liability vs Equity

2-Minute Summary

  • Classification follows the substance of contractual obligations, not the legal label placed on a share, debenture or preference instrument.
  • An obligation to deliver cash or another financial asset generally points to a liability; an equity instrument evidences a residual interest after liabilities.
  • Convertible and other compound instruments can require separation into liability and equity components at initial recognition.
  • Offsetting requires both a currently enforceable legal right of set-off and an intention to settle net or simultaneously.

Decision path

Scope→Facts→Recognition / classification→Measurement→Presentation & disclosure

Read the contract before reading the instrument name

“Preference share”, “debenture”, “shareholder loan” and “convertible” are not accounting classifications. Review redemption terms, coupon or distribution discretion, holder put rights, issuer settlement alternatives and contingencies. Mandatory cash redemption or a non-discretionary return can create a financial liability even when company law calls the instrument share capital. Conversely, an instrument with no contractual obligation to deliver cash can be equity if the remaining requirements are met. Tax or regulatory classification does not override the Ind AS 32 analysis.

Own-equity derivatives and compound instruments require exact mechanics

A derivative settled by exchanging a fixed amount of cash or another financial asset for a fixed number of the entity’s own equity instruments can meet the fixed-for-fixed condition, subject to the detailed standard. A convertible bond may contain both a liability for contractual cash flows and an equity conversion option; initially measure and present the components separately when the criteria are met. Treasury shares are deducted from equity rather than recognised as assets, and transactions in own equity generally do not create gains or losses in profit or loss.

Offsetting is deliberately harder than having balances with the same counterparty

Presenting a net number is permitted only when the entity currently has a legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts and intends either net settlement or simultaneous realisation and settlement. A master netting agreement that becomes enforceable only on default is not automatically enough for balance-sheet offsetting, although disclosures under Ind AS 107 may still apply. The close file should therefore include legal enforceability evidence, settlement mechanics and linkage to the disclosure note.

Worked example

A company issues Rs 20 crore preference shares that must be redeemed for cash after five years and carry a cumulative return that the issuer cannot avoid. The legal form says “preference shares”, but the contractual cash obligations indicate liability features under Ind AS 32. If a separate conversion feature meets the equity definition, the instrument may be compound and require component accounting rather than a single equity line.

Close checklist

  • Obtain final executed terms, including side letters.
  • Map every cash-delivery, redemption and settlement obligation.
  • Test own-equity settlement against fixed-for-fixed requirements.
  • Separate compound-instrument components when required.
  • Deduct treasury shares from equity.
  • Support any offsetting with legal right and settlement-intent evidence.

Questions practitioners ask

Are preference shares always equity?

No. Mandatory redemption or unavoidable distributions can create liabilities.

Does legal share-capital classification decide the accounting?

No. Ind AS 32 looks to contractual substance.

Can treasury shares be shown as investments?

No. Own shares are deducted from equity.

Can receivable and payable balances be netted because the counterparty is the same?

Not without both the enforceable set-off right and the required settlement intention.

Primary sources

For periods affected by later notified amendments, read the compendium together with the applicable MCA notification listed by ICAI.

Educational and professional-reference material. Apply the notified standard to the entity's actual contracts, facts and reporting period, and obtain appropriate professional review for material judgements.
Validation register

Primary and authoritative sources

ICAI Compendium 2025–26Primary or authoritative validation source.
Open source ↗
IFRS Foundation — IAS 32Primary or authoritative validation source.
Open source ↗
ICAI Ind AS resourcesPrimary or authoritative validation source.
Open source ↗
Review date: 26 June 2026. Recheck later MCA notifications and ICAI compendiums before applying to a later period.

Source and review trail

Use the current official instrument, portal or regulator publication before acting. Page-specific references are listed below.

Primary category
Accounting, Audit & Ind AS
Official starting point
www.icai.org

Page source links

MCA-notified Ind AS 32: primary-text control

For Ind AS 32, the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules and the MCA-notified text control the Indian financial statements. ICAI educational material and IFRS resources can assist interpretation, but they do not replace this notified Indian text or later MCA amendments.

MCA notified Ind AS 32MCA standards repository

Contractual substance drives classification

Read redemption, settlement, conversion and contingent-settlement terms together. Split compound instruments when required and apply offsetting only when both the legally enforceable right and net-settlement intention conditions are met.

  1. Freeze the reporting date, applicable Ind AS roadmap and current MCA amendments.
  2. Map the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure requirements to entity-specific contracts and ledger populations.
  3. Retain management judgements, source data, model controls and reviewer evidence.
  4. Reconcile the note disclosures to the financial statements and audit file, including prior-period comparatives.

Exam and advisory check

For Ind AS 32, a correct answer begins with the scope and facts, identifies the contractual substance drives classification issue, applies the notified paragraphs, quantifies the accounting entry, and then states the required presentation and disclosures. A conclusion based only on an international summary should be checked for Indian carve-outs and amendment dates.

Finin2min summary: anchor the analysis in the MCA-notified Ind AS 32, document judgements and reconcile every conclusion to the books and disclosures.

Home / Insights / IndAS & Accounting
More on IndAS & Accounting
Browse all IndAS & Accounting articles →
Related Articles
Ind AS 107 – Financial Instruments Disclosures (Extended) Ind AS 109 – Financial Instruments (Extended) Ind AS 115 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Extended) Ind AS 103 – Business Combinations (Extended) Ind AS 112 – Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities (Extended)