Significant influence
Participation in policy decisions without control.
Reviewed by CA Nikhil Gupta · Last reviewed 29 June 2026

Significant influence, equity method, long-term interests, losses and impairment. Prescribe accounting for associates and application of the equity method to associates and joint ventures.
Prescribe accounting for associates and application of the equity method to associates and joint ventures.
Participation in policy decisions without control.
Twenty per cent voting power is rebuttable.
Initial cost, then share of P&L and OCI.
Can extend into long-term net-investment interests and obligations.
| Paragraphs | Requirement and simple decode |
|---|---|
| 1–3 | Objective, scope and definitions Covers associates, joint ventures and equity-method terminology. |
| 5–7 | Significant influence indicators Use rebuttable voting presumptions, board participation, policy involvement, material transactions, management interchange and essential information. |
| 8–9 | Potential voting rights Consider substantive rights currently exercisable or convertible. |
| 10 | Equity method Recognise at cost and adjust for post-acquisition P&L, OCI and distributions. |
| 11–14 | Investor interest and long-term interests Include direct/indirect holdings and identify instruments forming part of net investment. |
| 14A | Ind AS 109 sequence Apply Ind AS 109, including impairment, to long-term interests before Ind AS 28 loss allocation. |
| 15 | P&L, OCI and distributions Share of investee P&L goes to P&L, share of OCI to OCI and dividends reduce carrying amount. |
| 16–17 | Exemptions Qualifying parent-style exemptions may apply. |
| 18–19 | Venture-capital election Specified investors may elect FVTPL investment by investment. |
| 20–21 | Held for sale and discontinued operations Apply Ind AS 105 to the qualifying portion and equity method to the remainder. |
| 22–25 | Loss or retention of influence Fair-value retained interests when influence is lost; proportionate OCI treatment on partial disposal retaining influence. |
| 26 | JV to associate Continue equity method without remeasurement. |
| 27–30 | Acquisition and ownership changes Identify goodwill/bargain purchase and account for changes while retaining influence. |
| 31–36 | Procedures Use recent statements, adjust intervening events, align policies and keep reporting-date differences within three months. |
| 37–40 | Losses Allocate to ordinary and long-term interests; recognise beyond zero only for legal/constructive obligations or payments; resume profits after unrecognised losses are recovered. |
| 41A–41C | Long-term-interest sequence Apply Ind AS 109 first, then equity-method losses and then Ind AS 36 to the net investment. |
| 42–44 | Transactions with investee Eliminate unrealised upstream/downstream gains to the investor’s interest; recognise losses indicating impairment. |
| 45–47 | Step acquisitions and dilution Measure goodwill and ownership changes without unnecessary remeasurement while influence continues. |
| 48–51 | Impairment Assess evidence and test the entire carrying amount as one asset under Ind AS 36; embedded goodwill is not separate. |
| 52–54 | Separate statements and history Use Ind AS 27 in separate statements and current notified amendments. |
Twenty per cent is a presumption, not a bright line.
Adjust for acquisition values, goodwill, policy differences, OCI and unrealised profit.
Apply Ind AS 109 before loss allocation.
Recognise further losses only for obligations or payments after interests reach zero.
Eliminate only the investor’s share unless the transaction evidences impairment.
Test the whole investment; do not separately test embedded goodwill.
IASB proposals are not current Ind AS.

Editable SVG and high-resolution PNG are included in the batch assets.
An 18% investor appoints two of five directors and participates in budgets.
Ordinary investment is nil and a long-term loan forms part of net investment.
Investor reports March and associate December.
Investor owns 30% and sells land with ₹30 crore unrealised gain.
Holding falls from 30% to 12%.
| Topic | Ind AS | IFRS | US GAAP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core model | Equity method unless exemption/election. | Broadly aligned. | ASC 323 differs in thresholds and mechanics. |
| Long-term interests | Ind AS 109 first. | Broadly aligned. | US sequencing differs. |
| Reporting lag | Maximum three months. | Broadly aligned. | Similar lag can be allowed. |
| Loss of influence | Fair-value retained interest. | Broadly aligned. | US derecognition differs. |
| Current project | No change without notification. | IASB project active. | Not applicable. |
Approve influence and loss sequence.
Track step acquisitions and disposals.
Align policies, dates and unrealised profits.
Identify net-investment instruments.
Challenge impairment and unrecognised losses.
Board representation, participation in policy decisions, material transactions, interchange of managerial personnel and provision of essential technical information can evidence significant influence. Voting interest is an important indicator, but the conclusion can be rebutted in either direction when facts are persuasive. Potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible may matter. The accounting paper should identify the date influence is obtained or lost because that date determines when equity accounting begins or ceases.
Start with cost, then recognise the investor’s share of the investee’s profit or loss and OCI using aligned accounting policies. Dividends are not additional income under the equity method; they reduce the carrying amount. Eliminate the investor’s share of unrealised gains or losses on upstream and downstream transactions to the extent required, subject to the standard’s exceptions. Reporting-date differences and policy mismatches must be adjusted where necessary. Goodwill is included within the investment and is not tested as a separate asset.
Apply Ind AS 109 to qualifying long-term interests before considering the allocation of Ind AS 28 losses. If the investor’s share of losses exhausts its interest, further losses are recognised only when the investor has incurred legal or constructive obligations or made payments on behalf of the investee. Once the equity-method carrying amount is established, test the entire investment for impairment when indicators exist. On loss of significant influence or joint control, the retained interest is measured as required by the applicable standards.
Investor A owns 30% of Associate B. Opening carrying amount is Rs 12 crore. B earns Rs 4 crore and pays dividends of Rs 1 crore. Ignoring other adjustments, A recognises Rs 1.20 crore share of profit and reduces the investment by Rs 0.30 crore for its share of dividend, producing Rs 12.90 crore before impairment or transaction-elimination adjustments. If A also has a long-term loan that in substance forms part of the net investment, the Ind AS 109 and loss-allocation sequence must be applied rather than simply adding the loan to the equity account.
No. Twenty percent is a rebuttable indicator; substance and other evidence matter.
No. It normally reduces the investment carrying amount.
No. Impairment is assessed on the investment as a whole under the applicable requirements.
Equity accounting stops and the retained interest is measured under the relevant standard.
For periods affected by later notified amendments, read the compendium together with the applicable MCA notification listed by ICAI.
A period-end control file for significant influence, equity pickup, eliminations, losses and impairment.
Start with voting power, board representation, policy participation, material transactions, management interchange and essential technical information. Twenty per cent is a rebuttable presumption, not an automatic definition. The analysis should also consider potential voting rights and the substance of arrangements that affect participation in financial and operating policy decisions.
Once an investee is an associate or joint venture within Ind AS 28, the equity-method ledger becomes a continuing reconciliation between the investor's carrying amount and its share of the investee's post-acquisition movements.
Begin with the opening carrying amount. Add the investor's share of profit or loss and OCI, adjust for distributions, acquisition-date basis differences and required eliminations on investor-investee transactions, then evaluate loss allocation and impairment. The bridge should reconcile to investee financial statements adjusted for consistent accounting policies and appropriate reporting-date differences.
Long-term interests that in substance form part of the net investment require interaction with Ind AS 109 and Ind AS 28. They should not be treated as an informal extension of ordinary shares without working through the prescribed sequence.
An investor owns 30% of an associate. The associate sells inventory to the investor at a profit and part of that inventory remains unsold to external customers at year-end. The equity-method working should identify the unrealised profit embedded in the closing inventory and eliminate the investor's share as required. A simple 30% multiplication of the associate's reported profit would overstate the investor's recognised share.
No. It creates a presumption of significant influence that can be rebutted; influence can also exist below 20% when facts demonstrate it.
They reduce the carrying amount of the investment rather than being recognised again as a separate share of profit.
Not necessarily. Long-term interests that in substance form part of the net investment require the Ind AS 109 and Ind AS 28 sequence.
Ind AS 28 requires discontinuation of the equity method and, where the retained interest becomes a financial asset, fair-value measurement under Ind AS 109 as specified.
Note: Professional-use caution: Equity-method caution: significant influence, investor-investee adjustments, long-term interests and impairment require investee-specific evidence and the full Ind AS 28 analysis.
Use the current official instrument, portal or regulator publication before acting. Page-specific references are listed below.
For Ind AS 28, the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules and the MCA-notified text control the Indian financial statements. ICAI educational material and IFRS resources can assist interpretation, but they do not replace this notified Indian text or later MCA amendments.
Evidence the influence assessment, align reporting dates and accounting policies, eliminate the investor's share of unrealised results where required, and test the net investment for impairment after applying the equity method.
For Ind AS 28, a correct answer begins with the scope and facts, identifies the significant influence and equity method issue, applies the notified paragraphs, quantifies the accounting entry, and then states the required presentation and disclosures. A conclusion based only on an international summary should be checked for Indian carve-outs and amendment dates.
Finin2min summary: anchor the analysis in the MCA-notified Ind AS 28, document judgements and reconcile every conclusion to the books and disclosures.